History Of Animal Testing: Pros And Cons - UK Essays.
The cons of animal testing are quite compelling, with alternatives available that offer more reliable results without inflicting pain on defenseless animals. In fact, there is a high rate of failure when it comes to animal testing. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued a report which stated that 92 percent of the drugs that passed the.
This debate on animal testing pros and cons will continue till scientists do not find an alternative to this cruel process of animal experimentation. You can decide for yourself, whether you are for, against or just a mute spectator to animal testing. Every coin has two sides, so does animal testing. It is now up to each one of us to decide.
List of Cons of Animal Experimentation. 1. Cruel and inhumane treatment Protocols in animal testing are often painful to the test subjects. They are forced fed, deprived of food and water, restrained physically for prolonged periods, inflicted with burns, wounds and pain to test for healing process effects and remedies, and even killed through neck-breaking or asphyxiation.
Animal testing essay approaches. Basically, there are two approaches to writing essays on animal testing. You may choose a topic that considers the historical context, as methods of testing and other aspects that don’t require your personal point of view. When writing such an essay, remember that you need to be unprejudiced and objective, to explore the topic as a scientist.
There are many pros and cons of animal testing. Some cons are over 100 million animals being burned, crippled, and abused in labs each year, 92% of experiments that do not affect an animal affects.
Pros and Cons; Advances; Medicinal Animal Experimentation: Pointless Cruelty or Necessary Evil. Pros of Animal Research “We have all benefited immensely from scientific research involving animals. From antibiotics and insulin to blood transfusions and treatments for cancer or HIV, virtually every medical achievement in the past century has depended directly or indirectly on research on.
The objective of this paper is to discuss the pros and cons that presently exist and provide a vision for the future of animal testing, which includes the use of alternate methods. The rights of animals and their use in biomedical research have been controversial topics with huge societal implications over an extensive period of time (Gannon, 2007).